Single Family Office · Zurich

Quarterly due diligence, from 120 hours to 12

120h 12h Quarterly due diligence, per analyst

The situation

Every quarter, an analyst spent around 120 hours pulling figures out of investment documents, validating them, and cross-referencing them for the family's portfolio review. Slow, manual, and exposed to human error at exactly the points that matter most.

What we deployed

A Due Diligence Agent, running inside the family office's own environment. It extracts the numbers, checks them against source, cross-references across documents, and flags anything that does not reconcile for a person to review.

The result

The quarterly review dropped from 120 hours per analyst to 12, delivered inside one week. Along the way the agent surfaced five forecasting errors that had gone undetected across several analysts and several years. The analyst's time moved from data gathering to judgment.

Investment Holding · Private Equity Portfolio

Portfolio monitoring across sixty-plus holdings, on a recurring cadence

60+ Portfolio holdings monitored, every report fact-checked before delivery

The situation

A multi-entity investment holding produces a standardized monitoring report for each company in its private-equity portfolio. Built by hand, the reporting could not keep pace as the portfolio grew, and consistency slipped from one report to the next.

What we deployed

A reporting agent inside the holding's own Microsoft Azure environment. It reads the portfolio data where it already sits, generates one standardized report per holding on a recurring cadence, and runs every output through a battery of fact-checking tests on names, numbers, and dates before it reaches the team.

The result

The engine produces the full report set across a portfolio of more than sixty holdings, each report validated before delivery. The same quality holds whether it is three companies or sixty, and the reporting stays current as the portfolio expands.

High-Net-Worth Advisory

A full workflow diagnosis, before a single agent is built

Diagnosis A sequenced build plan before a single agent goes live

The situation

A founder-led advisory serving high-net-worth private clients wanted AI across the practice, but first needed an honest read on what agentic AI can and cannot do for each part of the work, and in what order to build.

What we did

We ran a structured diagnosis of the practice: its workflows, documents, and tools, mapped against where an agent adds real value. The output is a findings report and a build sequence, with the prerequisites and the honest limits named up front.

What it surfaced

Clear early priorities emerged: a daily briefing that consolidates the principal's tasks across inbox, messages, and notes; turning one flagship market report into many pieces across channels; and a searchable knowledge base for templates and past work. The principal has a sequenced plan in hand before committing to a single build.

Engagements are presented anonymously. Named references are shared privately, with client permission, on request.

See it working on your data.

A 30-minute conversation to understand your workflows and show you where AI agents create the most value.

Book a Consultation